FOR the last couple of months the most
debating point in Indian PSU banking realm has been the merger of
subordinate banks with SBI. Will the merger of subordinate banks to
SBI pave the way for the creation of a strong and effective PSU
banking environment in the country? What are the...
obstacles on the way
of the much-anticipated merger? Here are seven key things you must
know about the whole issue.
Banks that are up for merger
SBI has five associate banks -- State
Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur, State Bank of Travancore, State Bank of
Patiala, State Bank of Mysore and State Bank of Hyderabad. Two of the
SBI's subsidiaries had already been merged in the past. The State
Bank of Saurashtra in 2008, and the State Bank of Indore in 2010
merged with its parent bank. The government-run State Bank of India
has five associates -- State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur, State Bank
of Travancore, State Bank of Patiala, State Bank of Mysore and State
Bank of Hyderabad. Out of these five, three of them are listed --
State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur, State Bank of Mysore and State Bank
of Travancore. According to finance ministry officials, State Bank of
Patiala is the first in the queue and the bank is set to merge with
the parent this fiscal.
The reason behind the move
Mergers of associates will help SBI
gain a reputable position in the global banking system and remain
relevant in the emerging economic scenario. None of the Indian banks
is among the top global lenders. The Size of SBI is less than one
one-sixth of the Bank of America. As per finance ministry, PSU banks
need equity capital infusion of Rs.2,40,000 crore by 2018 to be in
line with Basel-III norms. Rising stress on public sector lenders due
to loan defaulters is a major concern among all banks. NPA
(non-performing assets) is a major irritant plaguing the financial
health of the PSU banks. Finance Minister Jaitley blames economic
slowdown as the main factor behind mounting NPAs. The senior banker
said big corporate houses, notably those in infrastructure business,
were the biggest defaulters. Indian banks' exposure to infrastructure
stands at around 40 percent of the total lending.
Government's stand
Presenting his maiden national budget
presented on July 10, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley had hinted at
mergers of public sector banks. "There have been some
suggestions for consolidation of public sector banks. Government, in
principle, agrees to consider these suggestions." The finance
ministry had recently said they have appointed SBI Capital Markets to
undertake a study on mergers as well as recapitalisation of
state-owned banks and the report is likely to be finalised within a
month.
Does govt have any fixed plan about
merger?
Government says it doesn't have any
definite plans for merging PSU banks. Banking Secretary Gurdial Singh
Sandhu told CNBC-TV18 that guidelines on autonomy to PSU banks would
be issued in a month. Merger between the ailing United Bank of India
and IDBI Bank was a suggestion, and that United Bank could be a
candidate for merger with any other PSU bank as well.
What govt is not doing
Government is not planning to bring
banks under the Companies Act as recommended by the PJ Nayak
Committee on governance norms for PSU banks. On the other hand,
Narasimham Committee report pitched for lesser number of banks, a few
which are of an internationally significant size, some which have a
national presence and some which are regional banks. Two of the SBI's
subsidiaries had already been merged in the past. The State Bank of
Saurashtra in 2008, and the State Bank of Indore in 2010 merged with
the SBI.
A question of scalability and viability
The merger is a question of scalability
and viability. Additional capital would be required for the merger
and such funds would be needed for absorption of costs related to the
merger.
Problems galore
The five associate banks of SBI
together have around 75,000 staff. Each one of them has a different
work culture. So the merger is not an easy job. To ensure smooth
merger, the government may opt for one bank at a time. Some experts
say that bank with the stronger balance sheet should be given
priority. Those that are weaker should be strengthened.
No comments:
Post a Comment